Friday, 25 December 2015

'A FRAUD IN THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION' - A BOOK ON ROTTEN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY

Living in an ocean of corruption and scams and fighting against it alone at the risk of dismissal and other actions. Crucified by the system followed by resurrection. This is my real life story – a true story of an ex- senior audit officer of the Indian Audit and Accounts Department headed by the CAG of India. It contains my Anti-Corruption activities and fight against many malpractices prevailing in the CAG department as also in other departments. It also reveals the reactions from the department like disciplinary actions etc. against me and how I fought it and continued with the rebellion unabated. The main aim of this book is to give inspiration to others whom I had heard saying, "corruption is everywhere, it is an unavoidable evil of underdeveloped countries and what we can do?" The book is also aimed at revealing the truth to the public who treat CAG as an incarnation of god, but in reality it is not god but a FRAUD as is the name of the book indicates. It is also an attempt to show that what is submitted to the Parliament and the State Legislatures by the name 'CAG AUDIT REPORT' is full of fake and imaginary audit objections and genuine objections are not reported except in circumstances detailed in the book. It also reveals why the coalgate scam, 2g scam etc., came to light only after decades of its occurrences.

Part I of the book starts with the heading 'CAG NOT EVEN AN ACCOUNTANT'. Then a very interesting historical incident from my own experience is unfolded to establish that cag is not even an accountant.  From the 2nd chapter onward the author is unfurling his experiences in the audit side in support of the title of the book, starting with a quote from a decision of the Supreme Court of India while dismissing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) based on an audit objection (Draft Para) reported by the CAG in his Audit Report submitted to the Parliament. Finally, chapter 14 of the book is ending with, "is it not both CAG and the Ministry is fooling the Parliament and thus the people of India? Now it is for the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) of the Parliament to tell the public what they are doing with these kinds of audit objections and replies brought before them". 


CONTENTS
PART - I CAG NOT EVEN AN ACCOUNTANT
CHAPTER 1    THE IAAD WORKING CULTURE  
CHAPTER 2    AN INTRODUCTION TO CAG AUDIT         
CHAPTER 3    AUDIT - EARLY EXPERIENCE        
PART – II FENCE EATING THE CROP         
CHAPTER 4     THE NOTORIOUS (black) GOLD BOND SCHEME  
CHAPTER 5     CAG - A TOTAL LIABILITY TO THE NATION             
CHAPTER 6    WHISTLE BLOWER CHARGE SHEETED      
CHAPTER 7    THE REPLY TO THE MEMORANDUM/CHARGE SHEET        
CHAPTER 8    THE PUNISHMENT ORDER AND APPEAL AGAINST IT        
CHAPTER 9    FURTHER EXPOSURE OF THE AUDIT SCAM           
CHAPTER 10   APPEAL ORDER AND THE REVIEW PETITION TO CAG        
PART – III AFTER CRUCIFIXION AND RESURRECTION       
CHAPTER 11   THE CORRUPT AND UNETHICAL ADMINISTRATIVE MACHINERY 
CHAPTER 12   CROSS EXAMINATION OF CAG THROUGH RTI APPLICATION        
CHAPTER 13   CROSS EXAMINATION OF THE MINISTRY THROUGH RTI APPLICATION    
CHAPTER 14   LATEST UPDATE ON BOGUS DRAFT PARA



https://www.facebook.com/afraudintheindianconstitution
ALSO VISIT MY FOLLOWING BLOGS/WEBSITE:
indiantravelexperience.manjaly.net
centralemployeesnews.manjaly.net
cagreport.manjaly.net
https://www.facebook.com/afraudintheindianconstitution

Thursday, 3 December 2015

Swachh Bharat Abhiyaan - स्वच्छ भारत अभियान‎ a cheap publicity?

The Swachh Bharat Abhiyaan - स्वच्छ भारत अभियान is going at a speed along with 'giving up gas subsidy'. In this connection one of my recent comment/reply in the Economic Times is attached herewith. It is self explanatory of my idea that it is a cheap publicity for diverting attention from main issues. After 20-25 years, there will be a CAG audit objection on this scheme similar to 2G/Coalgate scams surfaced after about 20 years (Ref: my book 'A FRAUD IN THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION). 

Also read my other blogs:
cagreport.manjaly.net
centralemployeesnews.manjaly.net
indiantravelexperience.manjaly.net
publiccause.manjaly.net       

Wednesday, 4 November 2015

New and Old Gold Bond Scheme - How the ordinary

Now the Government/RBI announced the New Gold bond scheme. But anybody know what happened to the previous Gold bond scheme? It was an additional burden on the people of India. Poor people had to pay various taxes like Excise Duty, etc. to cover the interest paid to the gold bond holder for almost half of the period of five year bond period for which Government could not use the gold. To know more, read my book, "A fraud in the Indian Constitution".  Also see my comment in the Economic Times:


To know more about the availability of the the book, please go to below link:




ALSO VISIT MY FOLLOWING BLOGS/WEBSITE:
indiantravelexperience.manjaly.net
centralemployeesnews.manjaly.net
cagreport.manjaly.net

https://www.facebook.com/afraudintheindianconstitution?ref=aymt_homepage_panel

www.manjaly.net
























Wednesday, 21 October 2015

MAKE THE FUNCTIONING OF THE SUPREME COURT's COLLEGIUM SYSTEM MORE TRANSPARENT +

The proposal of the Government "The criteria for selection of judges to the higher judiciary should be spelt out and must be part of the memorandum of procedure and put up on the websites of the apex court and high courts to make the functioning of the Supreme Court's collegium system more transparent" is a welcome move. But this should also be applied to selection of candidates for election, appointment of Governors, appointments of heads of Constitutional bodies etc. so that people should know on what credentials they are being selected and no other better persons available in India among the over 120 crore people.

my comment in times of india


ALSO VISIT MY FOLLOWING BLOGS/WEBSITE:
indiantravelexperience.manjaly.net
centralemployeesnews.manjaly.net
cagreport.manjaly.net
publiccause.manjaly.net
https://www.facebook.com/afraudintheindianconstitution?ref=aymt_homepage_panel
www.manjaly.net

Monday, 19 October 2015

WHETHER SUPREME COURT CONSENT SHOULD BE TAKEN BY THE PRIME MINISTER IN SELECTING HIS COUNCIL OF MINISTERS?

Please do not forget Indian Legislature is a creation of the Constitution. All three wings of Government be it executive, judiciary or legislature, be it State or Union all are equal in their sphere. Separation of power of these three wings are the basic structure of the Indian Constitution. Whether any Political Party would agree if the court is interfering in the selection of the prime minister. Or do they agree to a proposal that Supreme Court should be consulted (with veto power) by the Prime Minister in selecting his Council of Ministers or Secretaries of the Departments? Similarly whether the legislature would agree to a proposal that Court's consent should be obtained for the election of the Speaker? Court is only interpreting the power and the competence of the Legislature and if they are not competent it, the law passed by them is declared as null and void. Is it not Supreme Court’s power of interpretation? To this extent I do not agree with the statement of the Finance Minister.
SEE THE ORIGINAL COMMENT BELOW:
Times of India comment on 19-10-2015

PLEASE ALSO VISIT MY FOLLOWING BLOGS/WEBSITE:
indiantravelexperience.manjaly.net
centralemployeesnews.manjaly.net
cagreport.manjaly.net
publiccause.manjaly.net
https://www.facebook.com/afraudintheindianconstitution?ref=aymt_homepage_panel
www.manjaly.net

Monday, 12 October 2015

My comment in Times of India agreeing with RSS Chief's Statement on Hindu development

I quoted below the portion of my comment in the Times of India which is self explanatory. Though I agreed with his idea of development, I disagreed with the stories he quoted as they are out of place. See my comments below:

''I don't think what the RSS Chief Shri Mohan Bhagwat had said as reported, "When 121 crore people will become strong and dedicatedly work for setting examples of goodness, India will become strong and it will bring peace and happiness in the world" is wrong. 121 crore, I think would include all sections of the society. But his sample stories are out of place. I don't think the Brahmin was so foolish to hand over the calf to the three shrewd people on simply hearing that what he was carrying was not a calf but a pup. Don't forget the Mahabharata example of Dronacharya and Eklavya and the incident behind the Onam celebration of Mahabali and Vamana. In both these incidents, innocent and efficient people were deceived to promote the inefficient. Still we instituted National award in the name of Dronacharya to honour him who had set a very bad example for the whole teaching community. This is also being continued today. Some brilliant people were suppressed to promote the inefficient not only in education, but in all fields.''

ALSO VISIT MY FOLLOWING BLOGS/WEBSITE:
indiantravelexperience.manjaly.net
centralemployeesnews.manjaly.net
cagreport.manjaly.net
publiccause.manjaly.net
https://www.facebook.com/afraudintheindianconstitution?ref=aymt_homepage_panel
www.manjaly.net

Wednesday, 7 October 2015

GOI-DOPT HAS NOW PRESCRIBED THE FORMAT FOR GIVING INFORMATION TO THE APPLICANTS UNDER THE RTI ACT,2005

GOI/DOPT vide Office Memorandum No. 10/1/2013-IR dated 06-10-2015 has now prescribed the format for giving information to the applicants under the RTI Act,2005. Accordingly, the reply should contain the following details:

(i) RTI application number, date and date of its receipt in the public authority.
(ii) The name, designation, official telephone number and email ID of the CPIO.
(iii) In case the information requested for is denied, detailed reasons for denial quoting
the relevant sections of the RTI Act should be clearly mentioned.
(iv) In case the information pertains to other public authority and the application is
transferred under section 6(3) of the RTI Act, details of the public authority to
whom the application is transferred should be given.
(v) In the concluding para of the reply, it should be clearly mentioned that the First
Appeal, if any, against the reply of the CPIO may be made to the First Appellate
Authority within 30 days of receipt of reply of CPIO.
(vi) The name, designation, address, official telephone number and e-mail ID of the
First Appellate Authority should also be clearly mentioned.”

Additionally, wherever the applicant has requested for 'certified copies' of the
documents or records, the CPIO should endorse on the document "True copy of the
document/record supplied under RTI Act", sign the document with date, above a seal
containing name of the officer, CPIO and name of public authority; in the following format:

“True copy of the document/record supplied under RTI Act.
Sd/-
Date
(Name of the Officer)
CPIO
(Name of the Public Authority)”


It is also mentioned that, in case the documents to be certified and supplied is large in number, information on RTI application should be supplied by a designated PIO but the certification of the documents, if need be, could be done by another junior gazetted officer.